Senior advisors and our own system find where AI pays off in your operation. Your people verify every number, and you leave with briefs ready to build.
Consultants are slow and bring a lot of overhead. AI tools can't see how your operation runs. We bring seasoned seniors with deep business knowledge and let the technology do the legwork, so every outcome stays grounded in how your organisation works.
The board signed off a savings number. The plan covers part of it, and nobody can say which steps hold the rest.
Pilots everywhere, a baseline nowhere. Nobody can show which one earned its budget, so the next one is hard to defend.
Your AI or automation team has capacity. The business can't tell them what to build first, or what it would be worth.
You're about to rebuild processes in S/4HANA. Knowing which steps to leave out is worth more than rebuilding all of them faster.
A vendor demo looks promising, a pilot starts, and months later the steering committee argues about whether it worked. Nobody measured the step before it changed.
Every step is signed off by its owner, costed from volumes and handling time, and ranked. Choosing what to build becomes a reading of the numbers.
Two hours with the person who runs the process. You bring the process you suspect costs too much; we build the first model with you in the room, and walk through what a pilot would look like.
Interviews with the people who do the work turn the first model into a process map. The sponsor sees the draft, and the process owner reviews every step.
Every step gets a current cost from volumes, handling time and rework. Each one is scored for AI and automation potential and ranked by return.
One session with the sponsor and the owners: the ranked opportunities, the reasoning behind each score and what we would build first.
For each step you select, a build-ready brief covering scope, data, controls, assumptions, baseline and handover. A working MVP where you want proof before you commit.
We measure the step again against the baseline we started from and show you the difference.
Start with the process you suspect costs too much.
Book a diagnosis callHow the process runs today, in standard notation, signed by its owner.
Who reviewed and approved each map and each figure.
What every step costs today. Every later result is measured against it.
Every step scored for AI and automation potential, with the reasoning behind each score.
Scope, data, controls and handover for each step you select. An MVP where you want proof first.
The measured change on the steps you built, against the original baseline.
We sit down with the person who runs the process. While they talk us through it, the system builds the workflow and times each step. They correct it as we go and put their name to it. If one step stands out, we can prototype it before the meeting ends, so you see what a build would look like on day one.
The session we book with the person who runs the process, first model included.
They correct the map as we go and put their name to it.
Prototyped in the room, when one stands out and you want to see it built.
Drawn in the same notation we use to map your processes.
We frame the question and understand the process
The system maps, analyses and costs
Your business owners verify
We advise what and how to build
One core process, end to end: the verified map, the per-step cost baseline and a ranked shortlist of opportunities. Enough to judge the method on your own numbers.
A department or value chain: verified maps, the opportunity map, a sequenced roadmap and build briefs for the steps you select, with KPIs agreed up front.
We build the MVPs you select, take the method to further processes and measure the result at day 90.
A build decision within ten working days of the readout.
You bring the process you suspect costs too much. We tell you whether it's a good candidate, and what a pilot would look like.
Or write to hello@reframeops.com